Adding Student Voice to Dr. King’s “What Is Your Life Blueprint” Speech

Dr. King’s “What Is Your Life Blueprint” speech gives a different perspective to King’s rhetoric. My students are immediately pulled in to his message when they watch him deliver the speech to middle school students. His words, supported with vivid images and strong metaphors, speak directly to students.

With the mission of getting Dr. King’s words off the page, I transformed the way I taught the rhetorical situation through this speech. Each activity centers student voice and agency in Dr. King’s message of finding and sticking to your life’s path no matter what obstacles stood in your way.

Tableau or Spoken Word Performance

Tableau and spoken word performance is the ultimate engager as students to physicalize with feeling Dr. King’s rhetoric. This trio created the image of the “crystal stair” in the speech and gave a passionate, from-the-heart mini performance. With just a small bit of text, and in under 1 minute, students can focus in on one or two images to create either a still picture in a tableau or a performed mini scene, putting voice to text. Students feel the alliteration, repetition, and rhythm in a way that cannot be replicated by silent reading.

Discourse Builder Roundtable Discussion

What it is: Join 4-5 students together to practice accountable talk and close reading. This is called a “discourse builder” because students are tasked with using probing questions to add on to what each person offers in discussion. This discussion focuses on close reading. Each student receives a text selection from the speech as a “mystery text.” I call it a mystery text to build anticipation before we read.

Why it works: Student voices are central to this activity just as student agency. They are not only engaged in discussion with each other, but each person gets to lead the discussion for their specific text selection. This builds excitement and serves as a scaffold to reading the full speech as students have already chunked and analyzed language in their “mystery text” slices. At the end of this activity, they have made and shared personal text connections, built community through shared ideas, questioned the text, and are familiar with unknown words, writing style, and message. And all before we even read!

The strategy:

Step 1: I select 4-5 chunks of text, focusing on excerpts with a significant amount of unknown vocabulary, complex sentence structure, imagery and metaphor that connect back to Dr. King’s message. I also make sure to differentiate text so that some selections are more easily accessible. I like taking selections from beginning, middle, and end of the text so that students get a sense of the arc of the speech before they read and can say “I know this!” when we get to the full text.

Tip: Point students in the direction of probing questions to focus and redirect accountable talk moves. I have on hand laminated probing questions cards. For my tenth graders, I love the “basketball question cards” that divide probing questions for accountable talk into three roles: Point Guard, Power Forward, and The Center. Students can’t miss these bright green cards in the center of the discussion.

Step 2: Cut up the text selections, making a set for each student group. Each group receives a “Discourse Builder” handout (linked here for free) with boxes for each text selection. I love manipulatives and any opportunity for hands-on engagement. Students glue in each text selection as they work through the activity. Each student is responsible for one of the text slices. They read their slice independently, making personal connections and questioning the text. In a round table discussion, when it is time to lead, each student shares their connection and questions to the table and leads a discussion about their text slice using probing questions.

Save the Last Word for Me

What it is: Similar to the Discourse Builder Roundtable, Save the Last Me provides opportunity for accountable talk with a focus on listening to learn. This is a great replacement option to the Discourse Roundtable if you are using it as a pre-reading activator with “Mystery Text” quotes. It also allows students to zone in on specific parts of the text during reading and as a reflective exercise looking back on the entire text post-read.

Why It Works: This is great for students who don’t like going first as it allows time for processing — the initial first step as the discourse leader is to read the quote and then step back and take notes to capture what the groups says in response. I love this strategy for building strong listening. It’s also a helpful exercise for students who struggle to monitor air time in discussion as it provides a structure for holding back to let other speak.

3 Levels of Text Discussion

This is another great discussion framework that facilitates text-to-self and text analysis through close reading. Read more about how to do this in your classroom here. The resource can be found here.

Reflective Writing Responses

What it is: Sometimes I call this “meditation” writing. Getting students to think about their thinking, building metacognition in reflective writing, also builds writing stamina as students learn to flex their reflective muscles. While my students read Blueprint, I integrate quotes relating to Dr. King’s message in the speech focusing on success, failure, adversity, tenacity, etc. from Audre Lorde, Angela Davis, Malcolm X, to name a few.

Why it works: These prompts are great discussion points on their own and create a nice compare/contrast analysis with Blueprint. The prompts work well because of universal themes, but also because they push students to compare and contrast–and synthesize–ideas from different voices. Here’s a few from my slide deck below. The full slide deck with 11 prompts can be found here.

Close Read with Purpose

What It Is: Before they read, I tell them that their reading mission is to determine which part of the speech (chunk 1, 2, or 3) is the most effective given Dr. King’s message and audience. This becomes the question for a debate or socratic seminar post-reading.

It’s important for students to learn to read for message (what the writer wants) and understand the relationship between message and audience/reader impact. After the pre-reading activator Mystery Quote activity, I introduce the concept of message and audience through the lens of universal ideas. It’s important for students to base their reading or analysis in universal ideas rather than facts or evidence. It helps students move from “What happened” to “So What” about what happened. Check out my free Universal Ideas lesson here. As a tenth grade, Pre-AP and AP Language teacher, universal ideas are the groundwork for analysis and prevent reliance on plot summary.

Why It Works: My reading go to is Reciprocal Teaching Groups, or variations of RTGs, where students read collaboratively to build meaning. In collaborative reading groups, students either work with Task Cards or with specific reading look for’s. This mission-focused reading sets up close reading with purpose and helps students to self-manage the text. Collaborative reading helps students process multiple look for’s simultaneously and pushes students to build stamina with a multi-step reading process. I have found that students are less likely to give up if they have a role to fulfill and are accountable to a reading group.

How: I have a digital version of Blueprint that is color-coded by three sections (beginning, middle, and end). It includes guided reading questions in a format that visually separates text for readers who learn better with sight markers to break apart the text. Color coding, or breaking the text into distinct parts, chunks the text with purpose. For paper people (I’m still in that bunch), a non-color copy is numbered into three sections, and students can box-out each section in different colors to visually code the text before they read.

Blueprint is rich in metaphor and imagery. A good starting point would be to talk about the title, connecting “blueprint” with the reflective writing prompt themes or messages, metaphors, and imagery that stood out to them from their Mystery Quote pre-reading activator.

This speech is a great way to introduce or reinforce the idea of tone as the author/speaker’s attitude towards their subject or topic. I find that students can easily spot tone when reading fiction and analyzing a character’s tone, but with speech analysis, students are learning to “read like a writer” rather than their life-long habit of “reading like a reader.” It’s really a flipswitch moment for a lot of students. This free “SPACECAT” resource is a great tool for rhetorical analysis. This “Read Like a Writer” lesson on diction and tone is also a good next step in rhetorical analysis. Check out my bundle of “Read Like a Writer” resources.

Here are some questions about tone and message to guide reading like a writer:

A tone wheel (honestly, I would wear this tone wheel every day–that’s how much I use this in writing and reading) is linked in the reading and helps students attach Dr. King’s language choices to tone. It also sets up a nice follow-up question for students to dig in deeper.

Synthesize Ideas with Socratic Seminar or Debate

Students take their reading purpose question and prepare a position statement or response for seminar or debate.

Level up debate through these moves:

  • Give students a position to defend. Students may at first question how they will debate a part of the speech, but building their argument muscle can begin with framing the parts of King’s speech as being defensible.
  • Adding in the “message and audience” as parameters can raise the cognitive demand as students must apply their knowledge of both to build a case for the part of his speech that is “most effective.”
  • The demand is increased even more when students push their argument to include how their selected text is more important than the other parts of his speech.

Check out more debate resources here.

This debate question can also apply to a Socratic Seminar discussion as students prepare text to support their position on the prompt. I’ve designed Seminar pre-work for students to verbally share their thinking with a partner before writing independently to prepare for the group Seminar.

Blueprint Lifts up Student Voice

This speech empowers students to connect to Dr. King’s message. The structure outlined above engages students even before they read the entire speech as each student leads discussion of a part of the text and makes it their own. It’s powerful to watch students enter the world of this speech and without even knowing it, they have learned the rhetorical situation through student-led discussion, close reading for metaphor and tone, and defending parts of the text against a claim in debate or socratic seminar.

I’ll end with a student’s observation of his “Mystery Text” selection during the Discussion Builder Round Table:

“If you are going to be at the top of the game, or at the bottom. Whatever you’re doing, going up a hill, playing ball, swimming, whatever you got to do…You’re going to mediocre it or be at the bottom? You might as well just do it. When he says “scrub,” if you think about it…what could that relate to? Scrub is like negativity. I relate that to basketball. When you call somebody a scrub in basketball, you’re being disrespectful. But he said, ‘be the best scrub,’ so he’s saying even if you’re down and not doing good, give it your best. That’s what I do. I can relate to that.”

Resources in this article:

Dr. King’s Blueprint Speech full resource, including:

  • The Discussion Builder Roundtable (digital and print versions)
  • Save the Last Word for Me (+ colorful quote cards, writing space, exit ticket, and slides)
  • 11 reflective writing prompt slides
  • Dr. King’s Blueprint speech with 3 sections divided by color, guided reading questions, and links; Blueprint speech without color for printing, also with guided reading questions and separated into 3 sections with numbers.
  • Debate slides pictured above
  • Colorful tone wheel pictured above
  • Socratic Seminar pre-writing space + partner share cards
  • Socratic Seminar accountable talk tracker and individual reflection space

Basketball Accountable Talk Cards / Probing Questions

Debate Resources

free “SPACECAT” resource

“Read Like a Writer” lesson on diction and tone

bundle of “Read Like a Writer” resources

Free Universal Ideas lesson slides

3 Levels of Text Discussion

Free Discourse Group Roundtable handout

How My ESL 3 & 4 Students Revised My Thinking on Teaching Debate

It was a real debate. It had an order that established expectations, but it was messy because it was real. Students believed in the process and their own part in owning that process.

Sometimes, it’s good to scrap those painstaking plans and give in to your students’ requests for “but please–just one more day!”

My ESL 4 students  were making their case for extending our final assessment to “just one more day.” I had planned for two hours of a debate, including everything from opening statements that were carefully pre-written in legal teams and practiced like a formal speech prior to debate day, cross examination sessions, team meetings, time-outs for researching additional evidence, and closing statements.Screen Shot 2022-12-29 at 11.56.51 AM

I started in-class debates when working with The Boston Debate League in my 10th grade ELA class and have tweaked the format over the years to extend the cognitive demand in different areas. Debates are dramatic play with students fully bought-in as they take on roles of Pro and Con or Defense and Prosecution.

This past year I adapted the debate structure I’d used in my ELA classes with a debate arguing for or against raising the minimum wage. Where I had always used debate as summative assessments of literature, this debate called on using informational texts and data the way my ELA debates used literary text as evidence. This adaption required skills in reading and synthesizing informational texts and also the agility to flip perspectives quickly in a debate to understand the argument “inside out” to develop counter arguments during the cross-examinations.

I spend a lot of time explicitly teaching questioning to further develop reasoning of an argument…and, to do this using text. This takes practice in many forms across discourse, reading, and writing. So when my ESL3 and 4 students pleaded for “just one more day” of debate, I did not hesitate to change my plan. This was a rich assessment: embedded in the curriculum, it was based on a sequence of formative assessments and aligned to standards. It reflected a clear Focus Language Goal and demonstrated growth in knowledge and skills. It required collaborative reading, writing, and thinking using complex text. Students had to listen carefully to each other, synthesize information, and redirect thinking in-the-moment.

The best part: It didn’t feel like a test. It was a real debate. It had an order that established expectations, but it was messy because it was real. Students believed in the process and their own part in owning that process. This, in my mind, is student-centered learning because it’s managed and enacted by students. Students push one another for evidence–they are choosing to not only engage as students taking an assessment but as decision-makers in a learning experience.

This is just one page from the Debate Packet that provides an organized space for students to record their attack questions (we attack with questions only). In my ELA 10 and AP Language classes students no longer require the scaffolding of “pause + think + talk + write” in order to craft attack questions and respond to opponents’ questions. This is a great scaffold to get students to the point of extemporaneously attacking and defending as a team. You can check out the full Debate Packet here. Screen Shot 2022-12-29 at 11.22.54 AM

What worked really well was dividing the Closing Statement into four questioning segments to get students to really think through their final points. In a collaborative “huddle” students talked and wrote through their closing statement while practicing a concession (#1 below) as well as recalling their strongest evidence. This Closing Statement organizer empowered students to stand before our judging panel and read aloud their planned writing.

Those Big Feeling Words

Especially this week with the passing of Toni Morrison I am reminded of her vision of “doing language.” Her words, and the way those words go together to create images and emotion, are a testament to how language is living because we “do” it: We construct and deconstruct, we mess with it, we use it in ways that are new and exciting…even if those ways come from the old and expected.

Language is enmeshed with the human experience. It is also our map of lived experience individually and collectively. When I was 12, my mother asked what one book I wanted for my birthday. I asked for Morrison’s book Beloved. I read it every night; I didn’t fully understand or grasp the words or actions in the book at that time, but I did feel deep emotion as I read it and long after. The language did something to my heart before my mind could process those words together. The book was an experience, and it haunted me. It’s a book that stayed with me and pushed me to believe and feel outside of my world.

I think a lot as I write and read and teach writing how to make words into pictures and movies–how can we mess with language to make people feel something beyond themselves? When I teach writing–especially personal writing–I experiment with ways for students to get messy with language. As a teacher, I am inspired by the moments my students are, in Morrison’s words, “doing” language. It’s the moment someone is hearing her voice for the first time through her own words on the page. It’s the moment someone has no words to say when she hears or reads the writing of her peer for the first time. My job as a teacher is to find ways to facilitate those moments for students and to help students see that they have the power and space to make those moments possible again and again.

This past year in my ESL 3 class we dug into emotional language as part of personal storytelling. I created and used highly scaffolded storytelling organizers so emergent English speakers could access the power of storytelling. You can check the organizers out here. I didn’t want to just reach emotional language for its functionality as a rhetorical device. I wanted to give space for my students to explore the big ideas and big feelings of words that hold meaning in our lives. The English teacher in me calls these “themes” or thematic words. But they are more personal and emotional than their literary function: These words are the words that stop and start us. They ignite something in you that you maybe cannot define or recognize by sight or name, but that you hold space with. I want to help students recognize in themselves what I did when I first read Morrison’s Beloved.

One student’s personal story, composed using the color-coded organizer above and linked in full below. The arc of the story takes the reader from past to present, and this writer beautifully claims her present and future in her words below.